Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 08:47

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
New Research Reveals That Humans Are Seasonal Animals - SciTechDaily
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Controversial Call Leads To Oregon Losing By A Run - University of Oregon Athletics
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Can a teenager take boron? (Read my comment below for more context if you wish)
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How can a hacker damage me, realistically?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour overview trailer - Nintendo Everything
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ravens in "introductory stage" of Lamar Jackson extension talks - NBC Sports
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Mapping XRP’s road to $2.35 – Bulls, watch THESE levels next - AMBCrypto